Skip to content

The Frog and the Octopus go to Snowbird

February 10, 2011

On February 11, the Frog and the Octopus will go to a celebration of the 10 years of the agile manifesto. As usual the Frog will remind everyone it can connect with that all software development projects are fundamentally the same, so there no need to get too excited about revolutionary new approaches, while again and again the Octopus will continue to say “all wrong, froggy, it all depends; it depends on the context, the context, the context!”:

Slides:

Title: the frog and the octopus

… on their way

The frog’s view point (=the elements that are common across all software projects I know).

Conceptual model of software project management: commonality

Conceptual model of software project management: commonality

See more in this Frog’s point: conceptual model

The octopus’s viewpoint (the contextual factors that make the spectrum of software projects so vast and interesting):

Contextual model of software project management: variability, context

Contextual model of software project management: variability, context

See more here: Contextualizing software development

And in summary: we need both to really understand software development project.

the two parts of the  conceptual model

Note: we love to eat frogs and octopus. The ultimate fusion between French and Japanese food.

3 Comments leave one →
  1. johnesmiller permalink
    October 19, 2011 13:28 UTC

    The Horror The Horror! They both live in Water.

  2. October 23, 2012 07:38 UTC

    Hi, I read through the frog and octopus and found the model simple and yet very effective. We are doing both traditional and agile. Sometimes we mix and match. Recently, I am doing some reflection and blogging on development methodologies. Of course, one size cannot fit all but also be careful of neither fish nor fowl. No matter which size you select, very often, the frog is to be sacrificed. Ironically, the frog is the primary author of the codebase, on which the successfulness of the product depends.

    In my last blog, I asked the question why a project can’t have multiple tracks. If we divide and conquer properly, the frog can stay on its own track while each arm of the octopus can has its own track. In software projects, it is the team structure. It is not hybrid-agile or Water-SCRUM-fall. Some teams are waterfall all the way through while some are purely agile. I believe that both extending agile by adding waterfall elements and forcing waterfall to adopt some agile practices are unnatural and unnecessarily confusing (sort of neither fish nor fowl).

    (http://leungkm.blogspot.com/2012/10/the-new-team-structure.html)

    I am relatively new to this topic. Any advices are welcomed.

Trackbacks

  1. Tweets that mention The Frog and the Octopus go to Snowbird « Philippe Kruchten -- Topsy.com

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s